25
Mar 10

BOOMERS AT LARGE

The first wave of Boomers left school to start work in the mid-Sixties. They were still rising through the ranks in the Seventies and early Eighties, making waves as consumers and young parents. It’s only in the last twenty years that they have started to take control, replacing their own parents in business, politics and the media. In 2010, as chance would have it, Boomers are at the peak of their influence. They are the establishment and the mainstream. Events on the local, national and international stage are played out between them. And the culture we find ourselves living in today is almost entirely down to them.

MASTERS OF THE UNIVERSE: BOOMER BUSINESSMEN

In 1996 the average salary of a FTSE 100 CEO was thirty-six times greater than the average salary in their company. Ten years later, this gap has widened to more than a hundred times.

Business is business; it always has been, and always will be, cutthroat. But just like old-fashioned street fighting (no knives, guns or dirty tricks), the rules of gentlemanly throat cutting have become more ruthless since Boomers took their seats in the boardroom. Best business practice can now be summarized as follows:

1. Kill off / take over the competition

2. Lay off staff

3. Create regulation to cover your tracks

4. Build a business in which a select few get the gold mine and most people get the shaft

The Credit Crunch, and the world economic downturn that followed, is the product of reckless disregard for the rules, insatiable greed and a rollicking sense of self-regard, all characteristics that have become institutionalized in the Boomer business world. It’s no coincidence that the high-flying businessmen from the Pampered Child era refer to themselves as Masters of the Universe.

They mis-sold pensions and mortgages to a public that didn’t know any better. They ruthlessly cut costs, outsourced jobs, stripped assets and worked for short-term payoffs. And they achieved all this by pushing for financial deregulation – gradually tearing up the age-old financial rulebook that was written to stop this sort of thing happening in the first place.

Of course, there have been financial crises and corporate losses in the past. But all of the record-breaking disasters have unfolded with Boomers at the helm. All the big financial heads that rolled during the Credit Crunch, from Stan O’Neal (56) at Merrill Lynch to Northern Rock’s Adam Applegarth (45), were Boomers.

The largest corporate loss in history, $61.7 billion by insurance company AIG, was overseen by Martin Sullivan, aged 55. The American taxpayer bailed out the company to the tune of $182.5 billion. Sullivan received $25.4 million for his trouble.

The largest corporate bankruptcy of all time was posted by Lehman Brothers for $3.9 billion under the stewardship of Richard Fuld, 64. Lehman was one of the world’s oldest and most respected investment banks until, under Fuld, it plunged headlong into sub-prime mortgages. It was forced to sell off $6 billion in assets in 2008, and dragged the stock market, and employees, down with it. Richard Fuld, meanwhile, kept $480 million in pay and bonuses.

It will come as no surprise that all thirteen members of the RBS board, who recently threatened to walk if their £1.5 billion bonuses were blocked, are Baby Boomers.

Last year, General Motors posted an annual loss of $38.7 billion, the largest ever for a car company. Their CEO, Rick Wagoner, is 56. The biggest ever one-day fall in the London Stock Exchange was overseen by Mervyn King, the 61-year-old Governor of the Bank of England.

In 2009, Time magazine published a list of the twenty-five most blameworthy businessmen and financiers responsible for the current crash. Their average age is 61. Our very own Sir Fred Goodwin, age 51, was voted as the greediest banker of all time. No wonder, for he was responsible for the biggest financial loss in the history of the UK.

Fred joined RBS in 1998 after a long and rewarding stint of free education at Paisley Grammar School and Glasgow University followed by work as an accountant. At RBS he soon earned his nickname of Fred the Shred, for cutting costs and jobs. Goodwin built the bank up with aggressive takeovers, and ruthlessly cut staff in order to generate bigger profits. In the same year that Goodwin axed 18,000 jobs from NatWest Bank, he bought a £17.5 million Dassault Falcon executive jet to fly himself around the world. He was knighted for services to the banking industry months later.

During his ten-year reign, RBS made over thirty thousand people redundant. With the money saved, they built new headquarters in Edinburgh for £350 million and headquarters in the USA for $500 million. They splashed out £200 million in celebrity endorsements. As the bank careered towards huge losses, Sir Fred redecorated his office with wallpaper costing £1,000 a roll. He spent £5.3 million lavishly refurbishing a grade A listed building – dubbed ‘Sir Fred’s Pleasure Dome’ by staff – that was barely used.  He paid out £100,000 a month on part-time chauffeurs and flew fruit in daily from Paris. Fred the Shred’s reckless Boomer greed finally ended in disaster when the £49 billion takeover of ABN Amro, Europe’s biggest ever banking takeover, stretched funds too far. He left shareholders with the biggest loss in UK corporate history, and the taxpayer with a £33 billion bailout bill. For his services, he paid himself a £16 million pension, drawing £703,000 a year for life.

His self-regard and greed knowing no bounds, he ignored pressure from his shareholders, the media, Parliament and even the Prime Minister to hand back the retirement package. In the end, the universe finally crashed around Master Fred’s ears and, retreating to a gated private estate on the Riviera, he shredded his own pension to £200,000 per year.

0

25
Mar 10

DOUBLE STANDARDS: BOOMERS IN POLITICS

From the moment our parents took junior positions in politics, in the late Eighties and early Nineties, they have diluted and in many cases dissolved most of the privileges that they benefited from when they were our age, one by one. In the last twenty years, the government has sold off our phone lines, TV stations, gas, airports, airways, steel, water, electricity, and they pocketed £50 billion (at today’s prices) in the process. The little that’s left – education, healthcare, housing, pensions – is either underfunded, prohibitively expensive or both. Every time our parents were given the option of maintaining services with taxes, or keeping the money for themselves, the majority of them voted for cash; and the politicians duly obliged.

Westminster is dominated by Boomers. The average age of MPs in the UK is 50.1 years and there is not one who paid tuition fees when they were growing up. We all do now.

From 1989 to 1997, the Conservatives ran our schools and universities into the ground with a 36 per cent reduction in funding for every full-time student. Then Labour swept into Parliament, screaming ‘Education, Education, Education’. What they meant to say was ‘Fees, Fees, Fees’ as they set about ending free higher education for ever.

Every single Education Secretary since 1998 educated themselves at university for free (except Alan Johnson who didn’t go). And every single one of them has voted strongly in favour of making us pay. Each and every one of them is a Boomer.

David Blunkett, 49, was educated for free at a college for the blind, originally established by a Victorian philanthropist and an anti-slavery campaigner, followed eventually by Sheffield University. But Blunkett enslaved future generations to debt, by moving to abolishing free higher education. He went on to abolish student maintenance grants in 1998.

Charles Clarke, educated for free at Oxford in the Seventies, went a step further by introducing £3,000 annual top up fees, despite a Labour manifesto commitment not to do so.

Fifty-seven-year-old Lord Mandelson, whose department now looks after education, is pushing for an increase in fees to £7,000. Students, says Mandelson, ‘have to face up to the challenge of paying for excellence’. A former member of the Young Communist League, Lord Mandelson enjoyed an excellent education at Oxford. For free.

If there’s no obvious difference between the main parties today it’s because they are all working to the same agenda: their own. The Boomer mindset is stuck on ‘me’, and politicians simply cannot help but act in their own self-interest; to the extent that they’ll pull back the rights and privileges of others to protect their own. This is the generation that marched in the streets for freedom, but ended up lining them with CCTV cameras. Boomer politicians from the Right and the Left have gradually abandoned their principles and migrated to the centre – the self-centre.

If ever there was an archetypal Boomer politician, it would be the former Blair Babe, 53-year-old Hazel Blears. All leathered-up on her Yamaha motorbike, she is one of the worst offenders. Caught red-handed fiddling her sizeable expenses, she is prone to Boomer greed. But it’s the hypocrisy of it all that makes her first among equals in the Boomer political class.

Blears voted strongly in favour of university top-up fees, having enjoyed a long and productive education for free. As a rising young star of the Labour Party, she vigorously opposed the abolition of Clause IV – Labour’s once untouchable commitment to nationalization – but helped to privatize large chunks of health, education and transport with Private Finance Initiatives.

She voted for stronger regulation of the tax system, but was later investigated for fiddling capital gains tax to the tune of £13,000. She voted against minimum wage rights for part-time workers, but claimed the maximum allowable expenses, down to the last penny, on her three homes. And let’s not forget that Hazel Blears’ shtick is that she’s a salt of the earth girl from Salford. In 2008, one-third of Salford’s children were living in poverty. Meanwhile, Hazel Blears was living in the Zetter Hotel in London, one of the ‘50 coolest hotels in the world’ according to Condé Nast Traveller.

0

25
Mar 10

GRUMPY OLD MEN – CELEBRITY BOOMERS

Endless opportunity. Relative security. Easy money. On paper, Baby Boomers should be the happiest, most optimistic people on Earth. But the teen rebels have become professional moaners, complaining about new fads that make them feel old, or bemoaning new laws that stop them doing whatever they want.

A few years ago, Boomers found the perfect outlet for this frustration in the TV show Grumpy Old Men (and later Grumpy Old Women). This was the chance for wealthy ageing Boomers like Rick Wakeman and Jilly Cooper, and others such as Rick Stein, A.A. Gill and, of course, Jeremy Clarkson, to moan about how awful life is, while at the same time being the most prosperous generation of all time and living in a country that gave them so much.

‘Is this the world we created?’ they whine to snatches of ‘Those Were the Days’. Watched over by the state, homogenized by business, intimidated by teenagers, imprisoned in their gated homes. Is this the world they created? The answer, of course, is yes.

You don’t need a degree in psychology to work out what triggers the Boomer grumps. It’s all down to their sense of entitlement, the belief that they deserve whatever, whenever they want. It doesn’t matter how much wealth or freedom they’ve got, they still want more. And when something stops them from enjoying it, they tend to throw their toys out of the pram, complaining to the Daily Mail about the (mostly imaginary) killjoys that are out to spoil their fun. Why can’t they build another extension on their house? Why can’t they take five holidays a year by plane? It’s their right! They earned it! And no meddling politically correct bureaucrat is going to stop them!

The conflict between teen rebel and grumpy old man produces a bewildering array of double standards. The generation famous for mini skirts, LSD and the Summer of Love demands that today’s teenagers be strung up for being irresponsible drunken layabouts.

When they’re not moaning, they’re embarrassing themselves pretending to be teenagers. The balding accountant in the flash BMW; the jowly old rocker at the back of the Keane gig; the middle-aged mum in the shopping centre dolled up in the same gruesome Ugg boots and Juicy Couture tracksuit as her kids: all tragic evidence of the Peter Pan Syndrome in full bloom. It would all be a harmless spectacle if they weren’t still in charge of culture. But they are.

Have you ever wondered why there’s so little new music on the BBC, why it runs endless retrospectives on dinosaurs like Roxy Music and Led Zeppelin, why culture programmes look like they’re made by your dad? It’s because the man in charge of that stuff is 63-year-old Alan Yentob. ‘I grew up listening to the Beatles, the blues and Jimi Hendrix,’ says Alan, ‘… but we are all ghetto kids now.’ So he jets off to personally interview Eminem. The toe-curling results have been deleted from YouTube to preserve the dignity of all involved.

When 50-year-old private equity guru Guy Hands took over EMI, he promised to save ‘The Greatest Recording Organization in the World’. How did this startling new vision for twenty-first-century music take form? A Beatles anthology CD boxset of course! All the good bands have since left, leaving Boomer mummy’s boy Robbie Williams to rescue the spreadsheet.

Madonna (51) and Bono (50) dominate the charts and the stadiums with grim inevitability. And without fail, Radio 1 gives them heavy promotion. Why does the nation’s ‘popular music station for 15–29-year olds’ sound like a hernia hospital radio station? Because it’s run by Andy Parfitt, a 50-year-old Baby Boomer.

Fast cars? Dad rock? Sagging waistline? Without a doubt, Jeremy Clarkson – perpetual adolescent and serial whinger – was born to be the poster boy of his generation. His screw-you attitude resonates with Boomer males who absolutely refuse to take responsibility for anyone other than themselves. In 2008, 50,000 Boomers signed a petition on the Number 10 website to ‘Make Jeremy Clarkson Prime Minister’. Could so many people really be that stupid? The awful truth is here http://bit.ly/clarksonforpm.

And then there are the jeans; the terrible loose-fit Levi’s belted over the paunch. His generation stole jeans from youth culture, and they’ll never give them back. Ever since Dress Down Friday (their hideous invention), jeans have become pretty much unreturnable in any case. Clarkson played a pivotal role in this theft. Fashion experts attribute Levi’s mid-Nineties sales crash to the ‘Clarkson Effect’ as a legion of dads attempted to dress like their kids. Sales of Levi’s have never fully recovered since.

More calamitous to our future, however, is the irresponsible behaviour dressed up in lad humour. On Top Gear, the ultimate Boomer behaving badly show, Clarkson scored points with middle-aged children when he drove a 4X4 across areas of outstanding natural beauty and scientific interest to reach the North Pole. It might have looked like a laugh, but it was really a two-fingered salute to the ‘killjoy’ environmentalists in the name of hard-won personal freedom. ‘I do have a disregard for the environment …’ he said later, ‘I think the world can look after itself and we should enjoy it as best we can.’ And so we return to this sense of entitlement – the in-built belief that self-fulfilment is a God-given right, regardless of the cost.

The mind of the middle-aged rebel is a confusing thing. The environmental movement, says Clarkson, is run by ‘old trade unionists and CND lesbians’ – the very same radicals that propped up the state, gave peace a chance and defined the generation he so reveres. The Greens, the Reds, the Nannies and the Bureaucrats have turned the world mad, he whinges, but what can Boomers do to make it sane again?  The answer is simple: jump in a gas-guzzler and tear down the road singing ‘I Feel Free’ by Cream.

0

25
Mar 10

THEM AND US

Three grand overdrafts? Multiple credit cards? One hundred and twenty-five per cent mortgages? Debt is so commonplace nowadays that it’s joined death and taxes as certainties in life.

There’s even an iPhone application that arranges short-term pay day loans, because wages never seem to cover the bills. Be under no illusion, there was a life before debt. These, today, are the cold hard facts that our generation will have to deal with:

THE MONEY

THEM £500 Billion in the Black

Baby Boomers are by far the wealthiest and most powerful generation in Britain to have ever lived. They own nearly £500 billion in assets, which is four-fifths of the entire nation’s wealth. They are the nation’s landlords, owning and occupying more houses than anyone else. They have the highest average income and expenditure in the population. And they are about to become even wealthier, as they inherit the houses and savings of their own parents, who were thrifty enough to leave any kind of legacy. Boomers now hold so much capital that parents are loaning money out like banks. Last year, the Bank of Mum Dad loaned an average of £12,000 to one in two children.

US £2.2 Trillion in the Red

In 1970, when many of our parents were graduating and buying their first homes, the average person owed 60 per cent of their annual income in debt. In 2010, young people owe 173 per cent. For most of us, mortgages and pensions are out of the question; we are getting into debt just trying to keep up with the basics. On average, we owe £9,016 in personal debts (excluding mortgages). And let’s not forget the national debt that we’ll be paying off for the rest of our lives. We, as taxpayers, currently owe £2.2 trillion – the worst level since the 1950s, when Britain was paying back its war debts. For ours, and future generations, there is no escape. Every child in the UK is now born with £22,500 debt as a result of the Credit Crunch bailout. By the time those babies graduate, they’ll each start their working lives owing over £40,000 in personal and national debt and that’s in today’s money. At the last count, there were 1.5 million 18–24-year-olds in poverty in England and Wales. And let’s not forget pensioners on the other side of the Baby Boom – one in three people over the age of 64 in the UK is currently living in poverty.

0

25
Mar 10

THE SCHOOLS

THEM

University life for Baby Boomers can be summed up with just one word: free. Not one student was charged for tuition. In fact, most students were paid to go. Local education authorities assessed how wealthy students’ families were, and on that basis gave them a maintenance grant, which didn’t have to be paid back. In the early Eighties, a student was given anything up to £4,000 in today’s money. Students with exceptional abilities could apply for State Scholarships, which gave all or sometimes more than the full grant, regardless of how much their parents earned. It wasn’t a luxury holiday, but they rarely graduated out of pocket.

US

University is so expensive that some female students are stripping and selling sex, just to pay the fees. This was the real life story behind the glitzy façade of Belle de Jour. Little wonder, when the average student in 2010 graduates with over £20,000 of debt. Tony Blair abolished free maintenance grants in 1998 and replaced them with Student Loans, which had to be paid back. With interest. Then, in 1999, local education authorities stopped paying tuition fees, and the cost was passed on to students. These fees have risen from the original £1,000 per year to £3,225. But it’s going to get a lot worse; universities and Lord Mandelson are pushing the government to increase the fees to £7,000 or more. On that basis, students will be clocking up close to £30,000 in debts, which will take graduates an average of thirteen years at today’s salaries of work to clear.

0

25
Mar 10

THE WELFARE STATE

THEM

Imagine a world where you were guaranteed an affordable house to rent, free healthcare and dentistry, and financial support when life took a turn for the worse. It used to exist. Rent control, full employment, universal healthcare: these were just a few of the benefits they drew from the welfare state, which was originally set up to eradicate the ‘five great evils’ of want, ignorance, disease, squalor and idleness. The downside was that it cost money, and adult Boomers consistently voted for low taxes while they earned high wages. Without enough money in the pot, the welfare state gradually started to be dismantled in the late – Eighties – the same time that Boomers began to enter government.

US

Spending on welfare as a proportion of the country’s income has halved since its peak in 1994. It has become more and more difficult to apply for unemployment and housing benefit, child support, sickness benefit or a pension. And for the few that do qualify, they’re worth a fraction of what used to be paid out. State pensions, which Boomers are about to enjoy, will probably disappear by the time we retire. All the money we paid into national insurance will have long been spent. The current government plans to offer people under the age of 30 the chance to opt out of the state pension system entirely.

Free eye tests were stopped in the Eighties, while prescription charges for drugs have rocketed, and it’s ever more difficult to apply for free dental care. In 1990, 90 per cent of adults in the UK used NHS dentists. It has since dropped to less than 50 per cent of the population. Eleven million people get no dental care whatsoever. In 2009, more than 22,000 people had to be admitted to hospital for emergency dental treatment because they couldn’t afford to pay for the work.

And it’s going to get worse. NHS managers have warned that the National Health Service faces a budget shortfall so large that it cannot possibly survive without drastic cuts. Ministers are currently considering making us pay to visit GPs.  Provision for legal aid is being reduced. Free bus passes for the young and old may end. The list goes on and on.

None of this really matters if you can afford to pay for private healthcare or a private pension or a mortgage on your own home. But the future for those that can’t is looking very, very grim.

0

25
Mar 10

THE HOUSING

THEM

Eighty-five per cent of Baby Boomers in the UK own their homes. They were mostly bought on the cheap, and the majority of them were Des Res. House prices were relatively low in the Seventies, when our parents began buying homes, but it was Margaret Thatcher’s Housing Act that unleashed the runaway property market that exists today. It was like a cut-price high street sale; council housing tenants who had rented for at least three years could buy their home for 33 per cent less than the market price; 44 per cent off for a flat. Best of all, if you’d been renting for twenty years, the discount was 50 per cent, all bankrolled by the taxpayer. One million six hundred thousand homes were sold off in England alone. House prices rose steadily, and our parents cashed in and traded up the property ladder with ease.

The average house price in 1970 was £4,974. In today’s money, that’s £60,235.  Our parents would have had to borrow three times their annual income on a mortgage. In return, they got a two-bedroom house with a garden.

US

House prices in the UK have risen by thirty-one times since 1970. The average price is now £158,871. And you’ll have to borrow 6.5 times your annual salary to pay it off.

In the last decade alone, house prices have risen by 90 per cent, raking in huge profits for ageing sellers, but pricing us out of the market. Ours is the last generation that can reasonably expect to buy our own homes. John Healy, the 50-year-old Conservative housing spokesman (with two homes) says so himself here: http://bit.ly/JohnHealy

Almost half of all mortgages taken out in the Eighties were with first-time buyers. In 2010, it has dropped to 15 per cent. Affordable housing is in such short supply that in the future people will have to wait until they inherit property when their parents die (unless it has not already been sold off).

Renting at the Hotel of Mum and Dad is fast becoming the only sensible option. One in five students now lives at home while they finish their degrees. And one-third of 20–34-year-olds are moving back home – priced out of the market by their landlord parents.

For first-time buyers, there are now only two steps on to the housing ladder: take out a 125 per cent fifty-year mortgage on an ex-council house and work past retirement to pay it off, or rent a small flat and wait for your parents to die.

0

25
Mar 10

THE WORK

THEM

Baby Boomers were born into a sustained period of full employment. That’s not to say that everyone worked, but anyone who wanted a job could have one. At one point, unemployment dropped to a record low of just 1 per cent. Unemployment benefit was easy to apply for; it was a safety net, which meant graduates didn’t have to rush into the first job they found. Stop and consider this for a moment:  that meant waiting for a job that you actually wanted to do!

Jobs were usually for life. Employers offered commitment and the employees repaid it with loyalty. It wasn’t unusual for companies to throw anniversary parties for staff who had worked there for ten, twenty, even thirty years. And yes, the old wives’ tales are true: you received a gold watch and a pension when you finally retired. In 1975, the average time spent working at a company was 10.4 years.

US

The average length of new jobs in 2010 is fifteen months. Jobs for life have turned into a life of jobs – if you can get them. Last year, 40,000 students left university and headed straight for the dole queue. And they were just the ones who could apply for support. The average number of graduates chasing every job has risen to 48 and starting salaries remain frozen. Plus we work between five and ten hours more per week than our parents did. And we don’t earn much more money, in real terms, to show for it.

Young Boomers regularly took paid apprenticeships as their first step into the job market. But we face a seemingly endless string of internships – essentially free labour with no promise of employment – before a company will pay us for our time.

Our country is the sixth richest in the world. It is significantly wealthier than it was thirty years ago. Why do we have to struggle with short-term contracts, temporary unemployment or multiple menial jobs? Because they, in their managerial positions, have outsourced or axed jobs so they can boost their portfolios of shares.

The official rate of unemployment in the UK is 7.8 per cent. But that figure is artificially low, because it has become so difficult to sign on. People who are out of work but aren’t entitled to benefit have been reclassified as ‘economically inactive’. At the last count, there were six times as many of them as on the dole.

Half the jobs lost over the past year were from our generation. The UK’s young jobless rate is the highest in Europe. Right now, almost 1 million people under the age of 25 are out of work.

Here’s a very depressing video that spells it out in full http://bit.ly/jobsvideo.

0

25
Mar 10

THE COST OF LIVING

Thirty years ago, money was not only easier to make, it had greater value. In 2010, a single person renting a small council flat needs to earn at least £13,400 a year to afford the minimum standard of living. That’s more than double the cost in the Seventies.

THEM (1970) All prices adjusted for inflation.

Weekly family food bill £32.20

Gallon of petrol £1.65

Pint of beer 59p

Cinema ticket £1.66

Football season ticket £64

Loaf of white bread 38p

Frozen chicken 57p

20 cigarettes £1.03

Haircut £24

Pair of jeans £20

US (2010)

Weekly family food bill £91.61

Gallon of petrol £4.36

Pint of beer £3.02

Cinema ticket £7.02

Football season ticket £471.96

Loaf of white bread 92p

Frozen chicken £3.27

20 cigarettes £6.46

Haircut £63

Pair of jeans £54

0

25
Mar 10

THE ENVIRONMENT

THEM

In the late Sixties, a book called The Population Bomb painted a chilling scenario of the world’s fate if people, and their principal bi-product pollution, continued to rocket. Over 2 million Boomers bought the book, and a few years later, both Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth were born. Since then, they’ve talked endlessly about the environment, but done very little for it. Between 1980 and 2001, the world’s electricity consumption rose by 88 per cent. World carbon dioxide emissions have grown by 36 per cent. Half of the earth’s mature tropical forests that until 1947 covered the planet have now been cleared.

Boomers might claim to have started the Green movement, but all that their banner waving has achieved is a series of failed talks, empty promises and missed targets. And Boomers are all talk and no action: with their ‘high disposable income and jet-set lifestyles’, they have the highest carbon footprint in the UK compared to any other age group. Since the first UN Earth Summit of 1992, Boomers have delayed action on the environment by pushing deadlines ever further into the future – our future to be precise.

US

The environmental outlook that our generation faces is overwhelmingly grim. According to the United Nations Global Environment Outlook, many of the world’s farming regions are at the limits of their production, three-quarters of the world’s marine stocks have been fished beyond their limits and pollution is now a major cause of death and disease. Species extinction has accelerated to the extent that 36 per cent of all known species are now listed as endangered.

The world’s population is now so big that we need more than a single planet’s resources to sustain us. With much of the world’s resources already spent, the leftovers cost a fortune. Oil production is expected to peak around 2013. Coal, at the current rate of consumption, won’t last beyond 2067. And yet the International Energy Agency estimates that global energy consumption will double by 2050.


0
 

You need to log in to vote

The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.

Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.

Powered by Vote It Up